Ender’s Game
One of our friends has a light review of Ender’s Game. Some good incisive points and you should read it.
There are two main claims I’d like to make.
- None of the other books besides Ender’s Game are canon or should be treated as such. I can give reasons for this but the assertion came first and the reasons came second. Mostly you just either get it or you don’t.
- Ender’s Game is a sympathetic book about Faustian man. Amazing capabilities married to juvenile maturity. It is a Faustian tragedy in two senses. The first sense is that it showcases the real successes but also limits of the Faustian approach. Not every concern is a discrete problem with a sociotechno solution. But Ender’s only hammer is to analyze a problem, find the areas in solution space that have been ignored because of convention, and then exploit them ruthlesslessly–so that is the hammer he uses over and over again. It is also a Faustian tragedy in that the Faustian world view tries to push to the very limits, including in the tragic form. Whereas the classical tragedy considers someone who is flawed, Faustian tragedies explore how good intentions and good actions can still cause disaster. Faustian tragedies explore how the same thing that makes the character great also leads them to their fall.
(The review is mostly right but goes a little too far trying to counter the yay total war view of Ender’s Game (and ignores real America’s own very Jacksonian character). The thing with the Faustian bargain is that you can’t unmake it. Once you see the buggers in terms of threat analysis eliminating them entirely as a threat is probably the “right” solution even if the buggers sincerely assure you it was a misunderstanding. In a real Faustian tragedy, there is no ‘if only the hero had done X, everything would have been better.’)
