Junior Ganymede
Servants to folly, creation, and the Lord JESUS CHRIST. We endeavor to give satisfaction

Judges, Samuel, Kings–Principles of Authority for Father’s Day

June 15th, 2026 by G.

For Father’s Day, productive and insightful way to read the transition from Judges to Kings, led by Samuel,  is to read it as a change from one mode of authority to another.  This is not a strain on  the text–that is basically what it is about.

My own summary is that the rule of the judges was lighter and looser.  It required Israel to obey without compulsion, which in practice meant going to the  judges to resolve disputes and voluntarily flocking to the judge’s banner when there was an invasion.  Judges were selected by charisma and competence, since following them was a choice.  This worked really well when it worked.

But by Eli and certainly Samuel’s day, the system no longer worked.    Eli and Samuel had lots of prestige but weren’t war leaders or really even leaders at all (not even in their own households).  My personal speculation why is that they didn’t try because they knew they would be ignored.  What isn’t speculation is that the people clamoring for a King gave the shirker problem as their reason for wanting one.  They said  they needed someone to force the hold-outs  and shirkers to go to war, and I think we should believe them.

So the evils of a monarchy that the Lord tells the people through Samuel, were also the goods.  Conscription and taxes allowed for the overbearing tyrannical rulers we see later (and even Saul and David had their lapses) but also meant that Israel was no longer hamstrung by coordination problems and defections in the snake-pit of Middle Eastern state violence.  Notice that this wasn’t just a solution for the shirkers.  Even the people who wanted to rally like in the days of old suffered from a lack of recognized leader–because if you rallied and no one else did, at very best you wasted a bunch of time and effort for nothing, traveling to the gathering place and sitting around and then futilely going back home again–and at worst you would get crushed by the invaders–so likely even the people who wanted to help sat around waiting to see if anyone else would.

 

Let’s liken this to ourselves.

In a very loose sense, the Church and the Saints are trying to do the reverse transition right now.   We are moving from a system where we have a number of rules and spelled out commitments imposed from above–skirt length, home teaching, three hour block, years’ supply–backed by excommunication and social pressure; to a system where there are much fewer explicit requirements and we are supposed to aspire to higher goodness on our own .  Instead of a rule giving us a mediocre average of morality, and like all rules only clumsily fitting the actual moral principles, we are now free to innovate to go beyond the average.

My impression is that for me personally and the Saints generally are completely failing the transition.  For most of us, ministering hasn’t become more sacred than the old hometeaching was.  My extra hour on Sunday isn’t an extra hour of communion with heaven.  We have treated all these changes as relaxations of rigor instead of as a regime of self-reliance.

And so like ancient Israel we are beset by Philistines and deserve to be.  If we ever take back the ark and restore the sacred places, it will not be our own doing.

 

Comments (21)
Filed under: We transcend your bourgeois categories | No Tag
No Tag
June 15th, 2026 04:35:53
21 comments

[]
June 15, 2026

You can’t solve coordination problems with less coordination. Either this is God’s way of forcing us into clans with stricter rules or it’s just punishment, it’s our faces ground into the dust.


Zen
June 15, 2026

I am getting the vibe, that we are going to have to live without access to our buildings or to leadership. And church truly will have to to home-centered.

We had better be ready for it.


[]
June 15, 2026

We obviously won’t be ready for it, aren’t ready for it. We’d have been more ready for it going cold from having a lot of programs we were experienced with than with decades of retreat followed by a plea to just do those things no one even remembers how to do. We’re failing a transition because no one is guiding us through the transition, which is our only hope because we can’t be held responsible for not doing things we weren’t remotely taught how to do.


John Mansfield
June 15, 2026

Last week I saw an article with photo of a BYU student/right wing yahoo named Kai Schwemmer. His mullet led me look up what had happened to grooming requirements at BYU. As with home teaching apparently BYU dress and grooming has been changed to principle-based with no specifics of implementation.


Michael
June 15, 2026

I think I kind of get it? (not that I like it) There is no secular monoculture to compare yourself to, the church itself is global. So to establish a set of explicit standards and practices requires having a strong culture yourself, As a church or as individuals or families, and then enforce it everywhere, which is legally, socially and otherwise risky. Would a 1980s or 90s style For the Strength of Youth work today? or would it cause mass apostasy?


[]
June 15, 2026

I think a lot of people are looking for structure. Who’s offering structure?


G.
June 15, 2026

A lot of people are looking for structure but think they aren’t and reject it when its on offer.


G.
June 15, 2026

A lot of people are looking for structure but think they aren’t and reject it when its on offer.

I am on the pessimistic side here (obviously, read the opening) but I don’t see an obvious alternative. There is no ‘if we would only just…’

Someone–probably many many someones–are going to have to soar.


Wesley Dean
June 15, 2026

I think we all have to start thinking and acting like we’re the only unit in the Church.


Zen
June 15, 2026

On one hand, the point about how we are doing poorly isn’t completely wrong. But I am not certain it is all a cause for pessimism. Look at the recent proliferation of people making LDS content – quality stuff too.


dontknockmysmock
June 15, 2026

My husband and I have both recently had two strong, connected impressions, that we received largely independently of each other.
The first was that we need to be living like an apostle’s family – that we need to be as spiritually motivated and ministeringly minded as they are or we will be being too complacent. (This might sound like a pretentious impression but for us it was more of an extreme anti-complacency message. Obviously we are all supposed to be like Christ, which is even more out of reach. My theory is that living like an Apostle is still absurdly out of reach for us but that having a slightly more visible goal was intended to shock us into – like G says- trying to soar)
The second was to have a ‘home where the Spirit of the Lord dwells,’ paired with a quote from the Bible dictionary that the only place comparable in sanctity to the temple is the home.

We have had some interesting impressions and thoughts as those two things have been our goals.

All this I guess to say that I’m kind of in the Zen camp that the decentralization is meant as a preparatory tool, and for me personally a lot of these changes have been an incentive to develop a better personal relationship with the Spirit (as per that P Nelly quote that has been reiterated by the GAs so many times).

The big difficulty, for my husband and I, has been trying to organize a community of people we can do things with. We are both awkward introverts and are missing a lot of spiritual opportunities because we don’t engage with other people I think.

Something I have been very struck by though while reading the OT, and connected with the John Adam’s quote brought up in the religious liberty broadcast, is how important it is to be a community of saints. It isn’t enough to be very motivated individually, and maybe not as a family either.


Evenstar
June 15, 2026

In the Old Testament, they go from having judges to having kings and in the Book of Mormon, they go from having kings to having judges. The Book of Mormon was written for our day so maybe there is some significance there.


Zen
June 16, 2026

“”In the Old Testament, they go from having judges to having kings and in the Book of Mormon, they go from having kings to having judges. The Book of Mormon was written for our day so maybe there is some significance there. “”

That is an incredibly important point, especially if I were examining this as a Jew might. The contrast is not accidental. The Bible is Israel slowly moving away from God, (in general, of course) and the Book of Mormon wants us to reverse that, and come back to the presence of God.


E. C.
June 16, 2026

In the vein of @don’tknockmysmock’s comment, I’ve had several very strong and quite clear promptings to do or become something quite different than I expected when I asked the Lord what, exactly, he wanted from me. Related to Isaiah’s exploration of the tabernacle as a refuge, apparently I’m supposed to create, maintain, or become a refuge . . . whatever that means.
Since the temple is a house of order and beauty, I decided to focus on making my home inviting, both in spirit and physically, as the temple is.
To that end, I’ve followed two pieces of advice: ‘tend what you can reach’, and ‘turn your waiting room into your classroom’.
So, I’ve spent the last two years doing house improvements, trying to better maintain my parent’s house and yard, and doing the work to host parties and get-togethers with friends and family. All of which sounds very prosaic and non-religious, but the intent is to consecrate my efforts to the Lord’s work, so I figure it counts.


Zen
June 16, 2026

Part of the Israelite’s problem when leaving Egypt, was that they had been slaves, and didn’t have the vision to be either free or holy.

Likewise, I think if we are going to do this, we need the vision of how to do it.

Like several of you, I have also had some personalized directions lately. For me, it has been having the Spirit with me, avoiding social media, web surfing and other wastes of time and learning to focus intensely, so I can get things done, both spiritual and a business idea I have had for a while.


dontknockmysmock
June 16, 2026

@EC, that’s really interesting. For us, one of the prompting about making our home a holy place had been to deep clean on Saturday, which also seems a little prosaic but has been a cool experience for us 🙂


[]
June 17, 2026

It’s not like the Israelites learned how to sin from kings – read Judges! or the Nephites became holy from their judges – read Helaman! the difference was in who was responsible for what. Out of all Nephite kings we only have record of a single one who was unrighteous, and he was king of a distant colony. Their monarchy was fine, they obviously knew how to handle it, and almost everything Mosiah warned them a king would do happened under the judges anyway (we don’t have records of the chief judges’ tax policy).

The difference was that Mosiah was no longer responsible for the righteousness of the Nephites, and, more importantly to him, his sons would never be either. The responsibility would be broadly spread through the population. This would prevent the sins of a king from cursing them, but it would also prevent the sacrifice of a king from blessing them, and their system lasted less than a century. Chilling thoughts if compared to home church.


Zen
June 17, 2026

Keep in mind, we are missing 400 or so years of Nephite history, that ended with their annihilation in the Land of Nephi. And only Mosiah I (father of King Benjamin) and the righteous surviving and joining with the people of Zarahemla.


Zen
June 17, 2026

Ok, that was a lame response that I had. It was true, but just a lame argument.

Yes, the Nephites as a whole, became more wicked, but the Righteous became more righteous, until they experienced Christ’s First Coming. Likewise, I think we are supposed to become more righteous, whilst the World becomes more wicked.

So yes, [] was right about the Nephites as a whole, but I think it still applies to the Righteous, and it is relevant to us.


G.
June 17, 2026

>In the Old Testament, they go from having judges to having kings and in the Book of Mormon, they go from having kings to having judges. The Book of Mormon was written for our day so maybe there is some significance there.

very perceptive


Zen
June 19, 2026

Let’s take this idea about Judges a bit further. Could the Constitution handle being interpreted this way? We know the prophecies about the government, and about the “full end of all nations”. And the period leading up to Christ visiting the Americas, was filled with political assassinations. So, I don’t think that this is only an intellectual curiosity. If the Book of Mormon is prophecy, then this may be our lived experience.

We know how an over-centralized government works. But how would a fully decentralized government work?

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.