July 08th, 2024 by G.
Ammon et al’s mission to the Lamanites reveals a unique state structure that we never see again in the Book of Mormon. There is a Lamanite high king who is acknowledged by subsidiary kings as their overlord. King Lamoni calls him father, he calls King Lamoni son.
It is very possible that they weren’t father and son. There are numerous examples of ancient monarchies where the ranking monarch calls himself the father of his tributary kings, and they call him son.
On the other hand, Lamoni refers to another tributary king as his friend, not as his brother. I also think it would be unusual for an overlord king to be travelling without retinue to visit a tributary king but less unusual for an irascible dad to just take off on his own to visit his young upstart puppy of a son for some much needed words of remonstrance.
(It is possible that there were retinue there, just not mentioned. In the early stages of state/empire formation–which is where I think the Lamanites were at–the king is still a warrior and expected to maintain challenges to his authority himself.)
(Speaking of the early stages of state/empire formation, the kind of political arrangement you see with a main king and tributary kings is typical of that stage)
(It is also extremely common to appoint trusted sons and brothers as important subrulers and viceroys at any stage in monarchy, not just at the formation stage. See Edward III, Edward IV, or Charles II)

Charles II’s Admiral of the Fleet–his brother James.