Uglification and the Cult of Authenticity
I think authenticity is the modern day version of the Puritan doctrine of election.
Remember that Puritan Calvinists believed that only the elect could be saved and that election was a pure act of will by God. This meant you could not achieve election by your own efforts. But it also meant that you could not really know when you were elected. The resulting anxiety drove a lot of Puritan behavior.
Now, our modern Puritans want to be authentic. But how to be authentic? If you are trying to be authentic, you aren’t authentic.
The resulting anxiety drives a lot of their behavior.
The insight that authenticity is supposed to be not understandable is a good one. If you can explain why you are doing it in terms that make sense to other people, then you are not doing it because of the ineffable upwelling of your soul.
Being attractive is suspect, because there are obvious benefits to being attractive. But there are no good reasons for being ugly. So uglification suggests authenticity. The cult of authenticity is behind the epidemic of uglification vice.
Immodesty and even slutty behavior by themselves suggest a desire to attract men and a taste for sexual pleasure. These are both understandable, therefore inauthentic. But sleeping around while piercing and tattoing and hairwhacking and generally uglifying oneself suggests that one is really doing it for self-contempt, which is a more authentic motive, since it obviously arises from one’s own feelings.
Being pleasant to other people also is suspect, because there are obvious benefits. Being pleasant is How to Win Friends and Influence People. Being angry and contemptuous is better. There usually aren’t obvious personal benefits, especially if you are angry as part of a cause. Anger also has the authenticity-enhancing effect of being uglifying.
Same with self-contempt and depression. Since there is no obvious benefit to self-loathing, it seems more authentic.
So uglification, rage, and self-loathing are characteristic vices of the anxious quest for authenticity.
Bruce Charlton
October 23, 2017
There is some mileage in this…
On the one hand, although it is strictly insane, there must be some psychological drive behind this stuff; on the other hand, there is no real coherence to modern PC/ SJW New Leftism except in what it opposes – and we ought not be trying too hard to systemise it.
I continue to find the Calvinist doctrine of election to be one of the most profoundly anti-Christian things that sincere Christians have ever made themselves believe (and there are Calvinists that I respect and like – such as the Orthospherian Alan Roebuck and Christian blogger Alastair Roberts…) Astonishing.
Agellius
October 23, 2017
I like it.
aardvark
October 23, 2017
Wonderfully insightful, thanks.
This seems to manifest itself on Sunday in the pews as well. It seems many see our trials as more real than our joys. Perhaps because trial/pain is associated with mortal life (expulsion from the garden) and joy is associated with afterlife…thus trials are for now and thus real while joy finds its ultimate expression after we return to live with our heavenly parents and thus any joy is only a reflection of what is to come?
bookslinger
October 23, 2017
aardvark: as blogger Ardis P puts it: “You’ll be better off when you’re dead.”