<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Junior Ganymede &#187; soft thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jrganymede.com/tag/soft-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jrganymede.com</link>
	<description>We endeavor to give satisfaction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:04:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mr. Obama, you&#8217;re no Einstein&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/02/07/mr-obama-youre-no-einstein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/02/07/mr-obama-youre-no-einstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deseret Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soft thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=2264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Debunking the Obama-Einstein connection: According to the Washington Post, David Axelrod, Barack Obama’s senior advisor, said that the president worked with “[Harvard professor] Laurence Tribe on a paper on the legal implications of Einstein’s theory of relativity.” I’ve read that paper, “The Curvature of Constitutional Space.” It’s complete nonsense. It shows no understanding of Einstein’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debunking the <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-vs-einstein/">Obama-Einstein connection</a>:  <span id="more-2264"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>According to the<em> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/24/AR2010012403014.html">Washington Post</a>, </em>David Axelrod, Barack Obama’s senior advisor, said that the president worked with “[Harvard professor] Laurence Tribe on a paper on the legal implications of Einstein’s theory of relativity.” I’ve read that paper, “The Curvature of Constitutional Space.” It’s complete nonsense. It shows no understanding of Einstein’s theory of relativity, or of the relationship between relativity theory and Newton’s theory.</p>
<p>I — to use Obama’s favorite word — do understand relativity theory. I was trained in relativity theory by the best. I was the post-doc of the late Princeton professor <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Archibald_Wheeler">John A. Wheeler</a>, who was himself the post-doc of Nobel Prize winner <a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1922/bohr-bio.html">Niels Bohr</a>.  Wheeler’s most famous student was Nobel Prize Winner <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Feynman">Richard Feynman</a>. I was also the post-doc of the late Oxford professor <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_William_Sciama">Dennis Sciama</a>, who was a student of Nobel Prize winner<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Dirac"> Paul Dirac</a>. Sciama’s most famous student was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking">Stephen Hawking</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not surprised that the soft studies try to expropriate ideas from the hard sciences to bolster themselves.</p>
<p>I <em>am</em> surprised that <em>anyone</em> takes the results too seriously.</p>
<p>I should know. As a designer of weapons of mass destruction, I practice the hardest science of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/02/07/mr-obama-youre-no-einstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

