I’ve been writing a lot about the nameless virtue, which is the virtue of unironically recognizing and praising standards that you yourself fall short of. The nameless virtue is easy to recognize when we’re talking about conventional sins and shortcomings. The inmate telling kids to stay away from the gangster life, the alcoholic who wishes he’d never taken that first drink, those are all standard fare. Along the same lines, what first brought the nameless virtue to my attention were Mormons who missed out on the basic steps of Mormon life extolling those steps. Those kinds of exceptions that prove the rule make the nameless virtue pretty apparent. (more…)
Those words would be as good an answer as I could give to the question originally addressed to Conan the Barbarian: “What is best in life?”
Filed under: Birkenhead Drill,Deseret Review | Tags: birth dearth, children, culture, demography, economics, education, family, fatherhood, LDS, Mormon, Mormonism
Two observations about the Book of Omni. The first is that the meeting with the Mulekites is actually quite important for the Nephites, because the Mulekites confirm that Jerusalem fell. Whether or not Jerusalem would fall was the major doctrinal conflict between Nephi and his brothers. Lehi has a vision to confirm it, and so does Jacob, but for obvious reasons their vision that their prophecies were right doesn’t really validate their prophetic authority. We don’t pay much attention to the Jerusalem prophecy because we already know Jerusalem fell. But the Nephites aren’t us. It meant something to them. (more…)
The Church has finally canonized D&C 132 and OD 1. Finally, they admit to polygamy! And they say activism doesn’t work.
I wrote this post in my head, wide awake at 3 AM in an uncomfy bed.
His Majesty dropped a totally random aphorism into the middle of the conversation.
If the self is a delusion, who is it that is being deluded?
Why do they keep trying to persuade me to freely decide I have no free will?
Who you gonna believe, the world or your lyin’ eyes? (more…)
When Wilford Woodruff was the 4th President of the church, he had a curious experience in the temple. He wrote in his journal,
Two weeks before I left St. George, the spirits of the dead gathered around me, wanting to know why we did not redeem them. Said they, “You have had the use of the Endowment House for a number of years, and yet nothing has ever been done for us. We laid the foundation of the government you now enjoy, and we never apostatized from it, but we remained true to it and were faithful to God.
Everyone of those men that signed the Declaration of Independence, with General Washington, called upon me as an Apostle of the Lord Jesus Christ, in the Temple at St. George, two consecutive nights, and demanded at my hands that I should go forth and attend to the ordinances of the House of God for them.
I straightway went into the baptismal font and called upon Brother McCallister to baptize me for the signers of the Declaration of Independence, and fifty other eminent men, making one hundred in all, including John Wesley, Columbus, and others.
When Brother McAllister had baptized me for the 100 names I baptized him for 21, including General Washington and his forefathers and all the Presidents of the United States–except three. Sister Lucy Bigelow Young went forth into the font and was baptized for Martha Washington and her family and 70 of the ‘eminent women’ of the world.
After politics, the most prominent and frequent occupation of these eminent men and women, was artist, usually as author, though there were also actresses,a playwright, painters, a sculptor and singers.
This included people such as Goethe, Washington Irving, Sir Walter Scott, Jane Austin, Charlotte Bronte, and Elizabeth Barrett Browning among many others. Here is a list by occupation.
This is what came to mind, as I read an article today about how the culture war about marriage has been lost. Movies and other media emphasize the exciting single life, with few exceptions. For instance,
According to a former editor of Marvel Comics, one reason why the graphic novel has nearly universally eschewed marriage is that it “kills a good story.” Whatever could be exciting about Clark Kent if he were to remain married to Lois Lane? Not much, apparently, because DC Comics erased the 1996 marriage from history, returning Superman to bachelorhood, the preferred state of our superheroes.
This affects how we think of life, and what we can relate to. This is a significant reason why homosexuality has entered the mainstream, as same-sex marriage is now as well. If I had the money to change the world, I would commission a TV show. Or possibly one on Youtube. It would have excitement and passion, life and death, love found and love lost… and it would have families. Happy marriages. It would have people keeping the commandments and others not, but with the consequences of a broken law. It would help people see a better, higher way of life.
This is outrageous. It is probably the worst thing I read all year. Some activists who wanted to end the death penalty coerced an innocent man into confessing to murder. They succeeded too. Read the details, they’re pretty bad. They got an actor to pretend to be a witness. They impersonated law enforcement. They got one of them pretend to be the innocent guy’s lawyer. It’s really horrible. But nobody knows about it. The activists get off mostly scot-free. The big public battle they won won’t get changed; no one will even hear about it. (more…)