NASA’s Irrational Approach to Risk
February 06th, 2012 by Adam G.
The greatest heresy to nanny-state liberalism is that some things are more important than (post-fetal) human life.
3 comments
Leave a Reply
- Recent Comments
- Zen on The Chief Rabbi of France is French
- Vader on Religious Liberty is Homophobic
- John Mansfield on Religious Liberty is Homophobic
- Michael Towns on Religious Liberty is Homophobic
- Ask a Liberal Mormon on Religious Liberty is Homophobic
- Nona on The biggest bombshell yet
- Captain Moroni on The biggest bombshell yet
- Vader on The biggest bombshell yet
- Michael Towns on The biggest bombshell yet
- Jeeves on Activist dead several months before her body is discovered
- Categories
- Well-worn Worddsabortion art atonement birth dearth blog hero Book of Mormon chastity chess children Christmas culture death deficit demography education Gay Marriage gender gun control guns hero history humor imaginative fiction it is a difficult concept Jesus Christ LDS marriage memory and experience Mormon Mormonism Obama on the sweetness of Mormon life poetry politics quotation and aphorism religion revelation made flesh Romney Science Fiction Sex SF SSM theological fiction we are Mary zion
- Blogroll
- Almost Chosen People
- Atomic Rockets
- Carnegie’s Hero Foundation
- Chivalry Today
- Common sense? What’s that?
- Demography Matters
- Disunion
- Doctrine and Covenants 2.0
- Emil Kiehne's New Mexico Law Blog
- End of Winter
- First Things
- Free Wodehouse
- Green Mormon Architect
- Hobby Space
- Iowahawk
- James Bowman
- John C. Wright
- LDS and Mormon Blogs
- LDS Church
- Licentious Godbeites
- Mark Steyn
- Matsby’s Religious Blog
- Medal of Honor Citations
- Mormon.org
- Nasa Space Flight Forums
- National Organization for Marriage Blog
- National Review
- Rollin’ With My Pepys
- Selenian Boondocks
- Square Two
- The Agellius Blog
- The Calvin and Hobbes Search Engine
- The Old Country
- Tim Blair
- Tony Woodlief
- TOTAL Nathan
- TOTUS
- Transterrestrial
- Treacher
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Why? Because I said so, that’s why.
- Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- September 2008
- Meta
John Mansfield
February 7, 2012
It’s not just liberalism. There are strains of conservatism, the kind that jeer at “nanny states,” that raise the sanctity of the individual so high that for them Billy Budd’s “God bless Captain Vere!” is incomprehensible.
Adam G.
February 7, 2012
JM,
all kinds of conservatism jeer at nanny states. Let’s not cede that prime ground for ridicule to the individuolators.
John Mansfield
February 7, 2012
My brush was too broad.