<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fourth Trimester Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/09/14/fourth-trimester-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/09/14/fourth-trimester-abortion/</link>
	<description>We endeavor to give satisfaction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:29:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agellius</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/09/14/fourth-trimester-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-45270</link>
		<dc:creator>Agellius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=5860#comment-45270</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t claim expertise in moral theology, but I think this article explains the issue pretty well:

http://www.cuf.org/FileDownloads/doubleeffect.pdf

If you read it I would be interested to know whether it answered your questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t claim expertise in moral theology, but I think this article explains the issue pretty well:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cuf.org/FileDownloads/doubleeffect.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cuf.org/FileDownloads/doubleeffect.pdf</a></p>
<p>If you read it I would be interested to know whether it answered your questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Greenwood</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/09/14/fourth-trimester-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-45247</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Greenwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=5860#comment-45247</guid>
		<description>I understand that Catholics do not believe that tubal resection is an abortion at all, based on the principle of double effect, though there reasoning is a little obscure to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that Catholics do not believe that tubal resection is an abortion at all, based on the principle of double effect, though there reasoning is a little obscure to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pecos Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/09/14/fourth-trimester-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-45244</link>
		<dc:creator>Pecos Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=5860#comment-45244</guid>
		<description>That there slope is slicker than a crude metaphor on a doorknob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That there slope is slicker than a crude metaphor on a doorknob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vader</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/09/14/fourth-trimester-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-45243</link>
		<dc:creator>Vader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=5860#comment-45243</guid>
		<description>Millstone offense ... nice expression.

It isn&#039;t widely known, but Padme had a tubal pregnancy once. Most of the time these things run their course. The fetus cannot possibly survive long in the Fallopian tube, and a spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) soon follows.

Occasionally the spontaneous abortion is delayed to the point where there is danger of rupture of the Fallopian tube and life-threatening internal bleeding. This was the case with Padme. We did not stop to consult our bishop or pray for confirmatory revelation before consenting to a tubal resection. Frankly, it never occurred to us to do so until later, when there was time for reflection. There was no chance at all of the fetus surviving, and significant chance of imminent real harm to Padme, so it seemed open and shut. I&#039;m not sure it even occur to me to think of this as an abortion; I thought of it as I would think of a D&amp;C following any other form of miscarriage.

Later, it sunk in what we had done. I think we would have done the same thing regardless (as I said, it seemed kind of open and shut) but it might have been good to have had a spiritual reassurance about it, for later.

But hours counted. There certainly would not have been time to consult the First Presidency, which is probably why ordinary bishops are given the awesome responsibility of judging the rare exceptions to the rule against abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millstone offense &#8230; nice expression.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t widely known, but Padme had a tubal pregnancy once. Most of the time these things run their course. The fetus cannot possibly survive long in the Fallopian tube, and a spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) soon follows.</p>
<p>Occasionally the spontaneous abortion is delayed to the point where there is danger of rupture of the Fallopian tube and life-threatening internal bleeding. This was the case with Padme. We did not stop to consult our bishop or pray for confirmatory revelation before consenting to a tubal resection. Frankly, it never occurred to us to do so until later, when there was time for reflection. There was no chance at all of the fetus surviving, and significant chance of imminent real harm to Padme, so it seemed open and shut. I&#8217;m not sure it even occur to me to think of this as an abortion; I thought of it as I would think of a D&amp;C following any other form of miscarriage.</p>
<p>Later, it sunk in what we had done. I think we would have done the same thing regardless (as I said, it seemed kind of open and shut) but it might have been good to have had a spiritual reassurance about it, for later.</p>
<p>But hours counted. There certainly would not have been time to consult the First Presidency, which is probably why ordinary bishops are given the awesome responsibility of judging the rare exceptions to the rule against abortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

