<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Widespread Marriage Bigotry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/07/12/widespread-marriage-bigotry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/07/12/widespread-marriage-bigotry/</link>
	<description>We endeavor to give satisfaction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:29:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zen</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/07/12/widespread-marriage-bigotry/comment-page-1/#comment-38495</link>
		<dc:creator>Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=5446#comment-38495</guid>
		<description>Excellent points all around. It will be agreed that polygamy is dissimilar to them all, but it appears that is going to be tested in federal court now. It didn&#039;t take long for that to happen.

What a terrible thing... mixing latin and greek roots that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points all around. It will be agreed that polygamy is dissimilar to them all, but it appears that is going to be tested in federal court now. It didn&#8217;t take long for that to happen.</p>
<p>What a terrible thing&#8230; mixing latin and greek roots that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vader</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/07/12/widespread-marriage-bigotry/comment-page-1/#comment-38473</link>
		<dc:creator>Vader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=5446#comment-38473</guid>
		<description>John said it first, but I thought of this as well. Notwithstanding all the talk of &quot;being born that way&quot;, an unwillingness to at least explore homoeroticism at some point in one&#039;s youth will be increasingly seen as narrowmindedness if not bigotry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John said it first, but I thought of this as well. Notwithstanding all the talk of &#8220;being born that way&#8221;, an unwillingness to at least explore homoeroticism at some point in one&#8217;s youth will be increasingly seen as narrowmindedness if not bigotry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mansfield</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/07/12/widespread-marriage-bigotry/comment-page-1/#comment-38472</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mansfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=5446#comment-38472</guid>
		<description>I fear that &quot;No?&quot; cannot be taken for granted.  An unwillingness to even consider the question, to test the waters and see where one really stands, will be taken by those inclined to do so as signs of stubborn, irrational prejudice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear that &#8220;No?&#8221; cannot be taken for granted.  An unwillingness to even consider the question, to test the waters and see where one really stands, will be taken by those inclined to do so as signs of stubborn, irrational prejudice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mansfield</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2011/07/12/widespread-marriage-bigotry/comment-page-1/#comment-38419</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mansfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=5446#comment-38419</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried to imagine some way-ahead-of-his-time lobbyist of a century ago trying to get a mystified legislator to propose a law clarifying that a married couple consists of a man and woman.  &quot;You&#039;re saying that when a man and woman marry, the man has to be a man, and the woman has to be a woman?  Look, pal, no one likes the emasculating effects of marriage, but we can&#039;t throw all the henpecked husbands in prison.&quot;

In contrast, laws against interracial marrying go back centuries, because without explicit prohibition such marrying is certain to occur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried to imagine some way-ahead-of-his-time lobbyist of a century ago trying to get a mystified legislator to propose a law clarifying that a married couple consists of a man and woman.  &#8220;You&#8217;re saying that when a man and woman marry, the man has to be a man, and the woman has to be a woman?  Look, pal, no one likes the emasculating effects of marriage, but we can&#8217;t throw all the henpecked husbands in prison.&#8221;</p>
<p>In contrast, laws against interracial marrying go back centuries, because without explicit prohibition such marrying is certain to occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

