The Contradiction of the Case for Gay Marriage
March 03rd, 2011 by Adam Greenwood
The case for gay marriage requires thinking that gender doesn’t matter very much. Male-male and female-female sexual relationships are only equal to male-female sexual relationships if you think males and females are mostly interchangeable.
You do not and will not have homosexual relationships without homosexual desire. Yet homosexual desire says that males and females are not mostly interchangeable.
QED and vive la difference.
I’m only embarrassed that it took me 6 years to come up with this simple and obvious contradiction in the case for gay marriage.
Kathryn Skaggs
March 3, 2011
Yup. Truth pretty much always boils down to simple math — and in reality, the gay argument for SMM just doesn’t add up!
tDMg
Kaimi
March 5, 2011
Wow, look at you, disproving the whole movement with a couple of simple paragraphs.
Though really, I’m not sure if this is a joke or if you actually believe it. You’re smart enough to know the difference between private and government distinctions. The argument that private acceptance of a distinction implies consent to government discrimination is clearly specious. This is obvious when we look at other forms of antidiscrimination law.
For instance, you believe that Mormons are not the same as Muslims (or Catholics, Unitarians, Zoroastrians). For purposes of private actions — who you choose to worship with, who you would date if single, who you would invite to the wedding — the categories are clearly not the same.
Yet you probably favor laws which grant Mormons the same marriage rights, employment rights, and so on, as every other group.
Suppose the law said, “only weddings solemnized in Catholic churches shall be recognized by law.” You would almost certainly argue that that law is unjust, and that Mormons ought to have the _same_ legal marriage rights as Catholics, even though Mormons and Catholics are _different_.