<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ultimate chess puzzle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/11/28/the-ultimate-chess-puzzle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/11/28/the-ultimate-chess-puzzle/</link>
	<description>We endeavor to give satisfaction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:52:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vader</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/11/28/the-ultimate-chess-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-20877</link>
		<dc:creator>Vader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=3820#comment-20877</guid>
		<description>As I recall, Horowitz and Rothenberg claim that someone calculated that there are roughly 10^127 different possible chess games. One followed by 127 zeroes. Of course, you would prune away ridiculous lines of play in any thorough analysis, but you can do an awful lot of pruning and still end up with more chess games than particles in the universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, Horowitz and Rothenberg claim that someone calculated that there are roughly 10^127 different possible chess games. One followed by 127 zeroes. Of course, you would prune away ridiculous lines of play in any thorough analysis, but you can do an awful lot of pruning and still end up with more chess games than particles in the universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gst</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/11/28/the-ultimate-chess-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-20873</link>
		<dc:creator>gst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=3820#comment-20873</guid>
		<description>Computers recently demonstrated that the opening position of checkers is a draw. It is thought, however, that chess will likely never be similarly &quot;solved,&quot; that is, to show that this position is either a win for white or a draw. There are too many positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Computers recently demonstrated that the opening position of checkers is a draw. It is thought, however, that chess will likely never be similarly &#8220;solved,&#8221; that is, to show that this position is either a win for white or a draw. There are too many positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

