Lying about receiving a medal is protected under the First Amendment
August 17th, 2010 by Vader
So rules the 9th Circuit Court. Quelle surprise.
Perhaps you’ve heard the old lawyer’s joke about the 9th Circuit Court:
Your Honors, I come before the Supreme Court today to appeal a decision by the 9th Circuit Court. But I also have other arguments in my favor …
Kaimi
August 18, 2010
Err — so your argument is apparently that the BYU grad, practicing Mormon, Republican-appointed judge with deep family connections to Republican politics and Ezra Taft Benson in particular, who was appointed by George W. Bush and confirmed 93-0, who has a history of vigorously protecting religious speech . . . is perhaps part of some vaguely insinuated silly liberal conspiracy, because he (along with his Republican-appointed, Idaho-native colleague) came to the conclusion that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech” really means that Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech?
Makes perfect sense to me. If he’s on the 9th circuit, he must be a commie. He’s probably gay, too.
John Mansfield
August 18, 2010
As one who was awarded the Silver Star (twice), the Distinguished Service Cross, and the Spanish Campaign Medal, I like this ruling.
Adam Greenwood
August 18, 2010
Also he said ‘quelle surprise’ in French. You forgot to include some leaden sarcasm about that too, Kaimi.
Vader
August 18, 2010
Me? Never. I said quelle surprise in English.
Vader
August 18, 2010
Oh, and Kaimi: I suggested no liberal conspiracy. I believe judges are quite capable of making silly decisions independently.
Kaimi
August 19, 2010
I maintain that lying about and receiving a medal both seem like reasonable things a distinguished veteran might choose to do.
Adam Greenwood
August 19, 2010
But not at the same time. The preferred posture for medal receipt is at attention.