<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the Trinity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/02/16/thoughts-on-the-trinity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/02/16/thoughts-on-the-trinity/</link>
	<description>We endeavor to give satisfaction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:20:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Greenwood</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/02/16/thoughts-on-the-trinity/comment-page-1/#comment-9926</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Greenwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=2337#comment-9926</guid>
		<description>BN,
yes.  Actually, the orthodox doctrine of the Trinity is really a negative doctrine.  Its an assertion that we do not believe in more than one God and an assertion that we do not believe that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are the same person.  Nearly every positive statement that is made about the Trinity by conventional Christians is either illogical, incomprehensible, or modalist, so they should probably just stick with Gregory of Nyssa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BN,<br />
yes.  Actually, the orthodox doctrine of the Trinity is really a negative doctrine.  Its an assertion that we do not believe in more than one God and an assertion that we do not believe that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are the same person.  Nearly every positive statement that is made about the Trinity by conventional Christians is either illogical, incomprehensible, or modalist, so they should probably just stick with Gregory of Nyssa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Nielson</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/02/16/thoughts-on-the-trinity/comment-page-1/#comment-9898</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Nielson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=2337#comment-9898</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s beautiful, really. I just have nothing to disagree with Gregory&#039;s quote over. I&#039;m always amazed just how much of a Trinitarian I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s beautiful, really. I just have nothing to disagree with Gregory&#8217;s quote over. I&#8217;m always amazed just how much of a Trinitarian I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Greenwood</title>
		<link>http://www.jrganymede.com/2010/02/16/thoughts-on-the-trinity/comment-page-1/#comment-9897</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Greenwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jrganymede.com/?p=2337#comment-9897</guid>
		<description>That is sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

