Prop. 8 survives.
May 26th, 2009 by Adam Greenwood
King Solomon says, uh, you want I should cut this infant horizontal or vertical?
1 comment
Leave a Reply
- Recent Comments
- Vader on Getting roaring drunk the safe and temporary way
- Jeeves on “A Previously Unknown Saying of Jesus?”
- Bertie on “A Previously Unknown Saying of Jesus?”
- Jeeves on “A Previously Unknown Saying of Jesus?”
- Zen on “A Previously Unknown Saying of Jesus?”
- Friedrich von Schiller on “A Previously Unknown Saying of Jesus?”
- Adam G. on Abinadi Supports Proposition 8
- Adam G. on The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage
- Adam G. on The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage
- Agellius on The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage
- Categories
- Well-worn Worddsabortion art atonement blog hero Book of Mormon chastity chess children Christmas credentialism culture death deficit demography education environment Gay Marriage gender Global Warming guns hero history humor imaginative fiction it is a difficult concept Jesus Christ LDS marriage memory and experience Mormon Mormonism Obama on the sweetness of Mormon life politics pro-choice pro-life quotation and aphorism religion Romney Science Fiction SF SSM theological fiction warmenist zion
- Blogroll
- Almost Chosen People
- Atomic Rockets
- Carnegie’s Hero Foundation
- Chivalry Today
- Common sense? What’s that?
- Demography Matters
- Disunion
- End of Winter
- First Things
- Free Wodehouse
- Good, Strong Men
- Green Mormon Architect
- Hobby Space
- Iowahawk
- James Bowman
- John C. Wright
- LDS and Mormon Blogs
- LDS Church
- Licentious Godbeites
- Mark Steyn
- Matsby’s Religious Blog
- Medal of Honor Citations
- Mormon.org
- Nasa Space Flight Forums
- National Organization for Marriage Blog
- National Review
- Rollin’ With My Pepys
- Selenian Boondocks
- Square Two
- The Agellius Blog
- The Old Country
- Tim Blair
- Tony Woodlief
- TOTAL Nathan
- TOTUS
- Transterrestrial
- Treacher
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Why? Because I said so, that’s why.
- Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- September 2008
- Meta
Agellius
May 26, 2009
WOO-HOO!!! This is the first I heard of this, Adam. Thanks!
I especially loved this part: “See, e.g., Ex parte Newman, 127 supra, 9 Cal. at pp. 511-512 (conc. opn. of Burnett, J.) [“The judiciary is but the creature of the Constitution, and can not judge its creator. It can not rise above the source of its own existence. If it could do this, it could annul the Constitution, instead of simply declaring what it means”.]